|
ANN ARBOR, Mich - As cancer
care begins to address the emotional needs of patients, a new study
from researchers at the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer
Center shows that it's important to address the caregiver's emotional
needs as well.
Researchers found that a targeted intervention
aimed at prostate cancer patients and their
caregiver spouses provided significant
improvements for the spouse in physical
and emotional quality of life.
"We need to provide more care and
concern to the family caregiver of cancer
patients. They have a vital role. We can
no longer leave them in the waiting room
or on the sidelines," says lead study
author Laurel Northouse, Ph.D., R.N., co-director
of the Socio-Behavioral Program at the
U-M Comprehensive Cancer Center and Mary
Lou Willard French Professor of Nursing
at the U-M School of Nursing.
Results of the study appear Nov. 12 in
the early online version of the journal
Cancer. The study will be published in
the journal's Dec. 15 print edition.
The study looked at 235 men with prostate
cancer and their spouses. Patients and
spouses completed a series of questionnaires
addressing physical and emotional health
at the start of the study, and again at
four months, eight months and 12 months
later.
The couples were randomly assigned to
receive standard clinical care with or
without a special family-based intervention.
The intervention, called the FOCUS Program,
included three 90-minute home visits by
nurses and two 30-minute phone sessions
over the course of four months.
FOCUS was developed by U-M researchers
and addresses five areas: family involvement,
optimistic attitude, coping effectiveness,
uncertainty reduction and symptom management.
Interventions were designed to encourage
communication between the couple, reduce
stress and improve
coping skills.
The researchers found that while patients
reported some improvements after the FOCUS
intervention, the spouses had significantly
more benefit.
Spouses who completed the intervention
had better physical quality of life eight
months and a year later compared to spouses
who did not complete the intervention.
The intervention spouses also had less
uncertainty, a better attitude toward caregiving
and less hopelessness than spouses who
did not complete the intervention. The
intervention spouses were more confident
about managing the illness and had better
communication with their husbands.
"The intervention had a stronger
effect on the caregiver than the patient
because the spouse caregiver had a greater
need for support. Typically, the patient
gets supportive services at the clinic,
from the doctor and nurses, or through
support groups available to patients. Caregivers'
needs are seldom addressed by these services," Northouse
says.
Northouse's previous research has shown
caregivers report similar emotional distress
as cancer patients. She's found that spouses
have lower confidence than patients in
their ability to manage the illness, and
more uncertainty about the illness. But
despite the need for support, few interventions
or support programs are aimed at couples
or the spouses of cancer patients.
"Prostate cancer is a couples disease
- it affects both the patient and the spouse.
Including the spouse is very important
because men with prostate cancer typically
rely solely on their partner for support
to get through the illness. But we know
that spouses often don*t have the
kind of information they need to deal with
the cancer and the very serious side effects
that can accompany the illness and treatments," Northouse
says.
"It's very stressful to be a caregiver
and not feel prepared for that important
role. And the more caregivers feel distressed,
the more difficult it is to be a good provider
to the patient," Northouse adds.
The researchers plan to look at ways to
make couples-based support programs more
accessible to patients being treated for
cancer. The FOCUS Program is currently
a research tool and is not offered widely
at U-M. For information about available
cancer support services, call the Cancer
AnswerLine at 800-865-1125.
In addition to Northouse, study authors
were Darlene Mood, Ph.D., WayneState
University; Ann Schafenacker, U-M School
of Nursing; James Montie, M.D., U-M Department
of Urology; Howard Sandler, M.D., U-M
Department of Radiation Oncology; Jeffrey
Forman, M.D., Wayne State University;
Maha Hussain, M.D., U-M Department of
Urology and Division of Hematology/Oncology;
Kenneth Pienta, M.D., U-M Department
of Urology and Division of Hematology/Oncology;
David Smith, M.D., U-M Department of
Urology and Division of Hematology/Oncology;
and Trace Kershaw, Ph.D., Yale University.
|